Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14667 (AP)

Kondapu Rambabu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/871/2026 · 2026-01-07

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010013722026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 871/2026 Between: 1. KONDAPU RAMBABU, , S/O LATE THATA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO.2-125, PARADESIPALEM, E.W.S., COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM-530017. 2. KONDAPU APPA RAO,, S/O LATE THATA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO.2-47, NEAR ANGANVADI CENTRE KOTHA PARADESIPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM-530017. 3. KONDAPU SOMBABU,, S/O LATE THATA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO.2-46, NEAR ANGANVADI CENTRE, KOTHA PARADESIPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM-530017. 4. KONDAPU APPALA SWAMY,, S/O LATE THATA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO. 1-53, PARADESIPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM-530017. 5. MUMMANA PARADESI NAIDU,, S/O MUMMANA APPARAO, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO. 10-107, P.F.COLONY CHINAMUSIDIVADA, VISAKHAPATNAM-531173. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522239. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM, A.P.- 530001. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, P.M. PALEM POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH-530041. 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, P.M. PALEM POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH-530041. 5. KONERU MAHESH VARDHAN, S/O. K. SHANKARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO.55-6-16, NEAR KRISHNA MANDHIR, VENKOJIPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM-530017. 6. INDRAGANTI BHAGAVATHI LAKSHMI, W/O. INDRAGANTI VENKATARAO, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO.302, G N SAMIYA HOMES, SUJATHA NAGAR, PENDURTHI, VISAKHAPATNAM-530051. 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a WRIT OF MANDAMUS or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the action of 3rd and 4th Respondents herein in interfering with the civil disputes between Petitioners and 5th and 6th Respondents herein in respect of the land measuring an extent of 922 Sq.yards or 770.91 Sq.mtrs., in Survey Number 50/5B, 50/5C and 50/5D part, Patta No.62 of Paradesipalem Village, Chinagadili Mandal, Visakhapatnam by conducting a roving enquiry on the title of the subject property as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction, in abuse of police power, without jurisdiction and in gross violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300Aof the Constitution of India and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. CKR ASSOCIATES Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioners for the following relief: < ... to issue a WRIT OF MANDAMUS or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the action of Respondents 3 and 4 in interfering with the civil disputes between Petitioners and Respondents 5 and 6 in respect of the land measuring an extent of 922 Sq.yards or 770.91 Sq.mtrs., in Survey Number 50/5B, 50/5C and 50/5D part, Patta No.62 of Paradesipalem Village, Chinagadili Mandal, Visakhapatnam by conducting a roving enquiry on the title of the subject property as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction, in abuse of police power, without jurisdiction and in gross violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and pass ...= Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. Learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that respondent Police are interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents in respect of the subject property. Without there being any crime registered against the Petitioners, respondent police are calling her to the Police. Learned Assistant Government Pleader seeks time for getting latest instructions. Considering the submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Respondent Police are directed to follow due process of law with regard to the subject matter 4 and not to call the Petitioners to the Police Station without there being any crime registered against them. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 08.01.2026 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 871 of 2026 08.01.2026 Mjl /*