APHC010011882019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 602/2019 Between: 1. P RENUKA DEVI, W / O RAJA SEKHARA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/ O. VISAKHAPATNAM ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL 3. THE REVENU DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KURNOOL DISTRICT AT KURNOOL. 4. THE TAHASILDAR, PAGIDYALA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT 5. PAGIDYALA GRAM PANCHAYAT, REP. BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, PAGIDYALA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT 6. K BALESWARA REDDY, S/O K.BAL REDDY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/ O PAGIDYALA VILLAGE PAGIDYALA MANDAL, 2 JS,J W.P.No.602 of 2019 KURNOOL DISTRICT. 7. B V RAMI REDDY, S/O CHENCHI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/ O PAGIDYALA VILLAGE PAGIDYALA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or any other order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring .the action of the respondents 3 to 5 in not considering the petitioners' representation dated 19.11.2018 submitted, objections for mutation of the names of the respondents 6 and 7 in the revenue/ panchayat records in respect of Ac.3.92 cents comprised in Sy.Nos. 507 / 1 and 2, Ac.0.461/2 cents in SY.No.507 / 1, Ac.0.131/2 cents in S Y.No.507 /2, house bearing Door No.2/2 and hut situated in Ward No.2, situated in Pagidyala village and Mandal Kurnool District as illegal and contrary to the provisions of the A.P.Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971, A.P.Gram Panchayat Act and the Rules framed thereunder and also violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to consider the petitioners objections IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NARASIMHULU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3 JS,J W.P.No.602 of 2019 2. K RATHANGA PANI REDDY 3. G VENKATA REDDY This Court made the following: 4 JS,J W.P.No.602 of 2019 ORDER: Sri Narasimhulu Parise, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that since the names of the unofficial respondents were mutated in the revenue records with regard to the subject property, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration and the writ petition has become infructuous. In view of the aforesaid submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 2nd March, 2026 cbs 5 JS,J W.P.No.602 of 2019 THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION No.602 of 2019 2nd March, 2026 cbs