Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14659 (BOM)

KETAN VINAYCHANCI PAREKH v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

REVN/467/2019 · 2026-10-05

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1-REVN-467-2019 (CR).doc Shubhada S Kadam IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 467 OF 2019 Ketan Vinaychanci Parekh ...Applicant/s Versus The Union of India and anr. ...Respondent/s _________________________________________________________________ Mr. Mohan Rao, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. Kuldeep S. Patil along with Mr. Digvijay S. Kachare with Mr. Anay Joshi, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. B. B. Kulkarni, APP for Respondent No.2-State. _________________________________________________________________ CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 5th OCTOBER, 2026. P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned SPP for respondent No.1 and learned APP for respondent No.2. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the application. 3. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the applicant, the application is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM Digitally signed by SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM Date: 2026.10.06 18:32:22 +0530