Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14656 (CHH)

RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA v. JOINT COMMISSIONER (APPEALS)

WPT/99/2023 · 2026-04-19

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:17848 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPT No. 99 of 2023 * - Rajesh Kumar Gupta S/o Surendra Prasad Gupta Aged About 34 Years R/o Balaji Ward No. 13, G-10 Bailakota Complex, Maharani Hospital, Jagdalpur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner Versus 1 - Joint Commissioner (Appeals) State Goods And Service Tax, Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Assistant Commissioner, Division-II, Jagdalpur Circle-1, State Goods And Services Tax, Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Palash Soni, Advocate For Respondents/State : Ms. Anuradh Jain, Dy.Govt. Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 20/04/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.a That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the present writ petition. 10.b That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue writ/Order/Direction thereby allowing the ITC in terms of Circular no. 183/2022-GST issued by CBIC, as claimed by the petitioner for purchases made by M/S Kusum Traders & Hardware amounting to CGST-Rs.1,27,294/- & SGST- Rs.1,27,294/- (Total-Rs.1,54,588/-) for which the Certificate/Letter of confirmation was already provided by the supplier. 10.c That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue writ/Order/Direction to respondents thereby holding the impugned Order passed by Respondent no. 1 in Annexure-P/7 as issued to the petitioner as bad in law and / Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI Date: 2026.04.21 14:42:12 +0530 2 or in violation of fundamental rights and / or in violation of principles of natural justice and quash/set aside the same. 10.d That, this Court may kindly be pleased to issue order/s, direction/s, writ/s or any other relief/s as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper considering the facts and circumstances of the present case and in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to prefer an appeal before the GST Appellate Tribunal. 3. No objection from other side. 4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti