Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14652 (BOM)

NIRMAL KUMAR CHORARIA AND ORS v. THE STATE OF MAHARATRA THR THE SECRETARY COOPERTION DEPT AND ORS

WP/13277/2026 · 2026-10-06

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Renuka Thakur 903-WP-13277-2026.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 13277 OF 2026 Nirmal Kumar Choraria And Ors ...Petitioner V/s. The State Of Maharatra Through the Secretary Co-operation Dept and Ors ...Respondent ________________ Mr. Swaraj Jadhav with Ms. Shruti Kumbar i/b Mr. Vikas Kumbhar for Petitioner. Mr. Ryan D'souza with Mr. Shivam Laturia for Respondent No. 3-society. Mr. Charles D'souza i/b Ms. Kashmira Dingankar for Respondent Nos. 4 to 8. Ms. Savita A. Prabhune, AGP for Respondent-State. ________________ CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATED: 6 OCTOBER 2026. P.C.: 1) Mr. Jadhav, the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the Petition with liberty to file Appeal against order dated 1 October 2026. He submits that since disqualification of Respondent Nos. 4 to 8 was sought before the Deputy Registrar and since election programme is likely to be declared, the direction be issued to the Appellate Authority to decide the Appeal in an expeditious manner. Page No. 1 of 2 6 OCTOBER 2026 Renuka Thakur 903-WP-13277-2026.docx 2) The Petition is permitted to be withdrawn and disposed of with a liberty to file Appeal against the order dated 1 October 2026. 3) All contentions on merits are expressly kept open. The Appellate Authority shall accord due priority for expeditious disposal of the Appeal. 4) The Appeal filed by Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 shall also be heard analogously by the Appellate Authority while deciding the Appeal that the Petitioner proposes to file. [SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] Page No. 2 of 2 6 OCTOBER 2026 Signed by: Renuka S Thakur Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 06/10/2026 17:33:30