1 2026:CGHC:14710 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2864 of 2026 1 - Harita Jharia D/o Shri Lakhan Lal Jharia Aged About 35 Years House No. 18 Ward No. 1 Village Jabga Tahsil Dharamjaigarh District- Raigarh (C.G.) ... Petitioner Versus 1 - Jila Vanopaj Sahkari Union Maryadit Through Managing Director, Jila Vanopaj Sahkari Union Maryadit Dharamjaigarh District- Raigarh (C.G.) ... Respondent For Petitioner : Ms. Deepali Pandey, Advocate SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 30/03 /2026 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus directing the Respondents to consider the petitioner’s improved higher secondary marks (78.8%) obtained in the Improvement Examination. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may, kindly be pleased to direct the Respondents to revise the merit list accordingly; 10.3 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the Respondents to grant appointment to the Petitioner on the post of Manager, Prathmik Vanopaj Sakhari Samiti Maryadit, Jabga, if found eligibile. 10.4 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to decide the petitioner’s representations dated 05.03.2026 within a stipulated time, 10.5 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief which this Hon’ble Court 2 deems fit in the present facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be granted.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the advertisement issued by the Respondents, petitioner submitted her application for appointment on the post of Manager. At the time of preparing of merit-list, marks of the petitioner which was taken into consideration was of Higher Secondary School and the mark-sheet was of the year 2013. Petitioner submitted an application along with the mark- sheet of the Higher Secondary School Examination of the year 2025, (in the improvement examination) that was not taken into consideration against which, petitioner had submitted representation before the Respondent on 05.03.2026 which is pending consideration and therefore, direction be issued to the Respondent to consider and take decision on the pending representation at the earliest within specified time. 3. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the documents placed on record. 4. On due consideration of the submission of counsel for the respective parties, facts and circumstances of the case, nature of grievance raised by the petitioner, without entering into the merits of the claim of petitioner, this writ petition at this stage is disposed of directing the Respondent to consider and take decision on the representation dated 05.03.2026 (Annexure P/1) submitted by the petitioner in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of 03 weeks from the date of receipt of order. 5. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY