SIRI NIVASAM MUTUALLY AIDED COOPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LIMITED v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/897/2026 · 2026-01-07
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14651 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14651 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010013712026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 897/2026 Between:
1. SIRI NIVASAM MUTUALLY AIDED COOPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LIMITED, COOPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LIMITED, TIRUPATHI REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT GAVINI GIRIDHARA MURARI S/O.ADI NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, G.G.NAGAR, GOLLAPALLI ROAD,
TUMMALAGUNTA POST, TIRUPATHI RURAL MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, SECRETARIATE BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI,- 2.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT, TIRUPATHI, 3
3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, WEST ZONE, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT TIRUPATHI, 4.
4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, M.R.PALLI POLICE STATION, TIURPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT, I ,EARLIER CHITHOOR DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order, or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, challenging the inaction of the respondents in protecting, implementing the Orders in Writ Petition No.22567 of 2018 dt.10-07-2018 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the state of Telangana and for the state of Andhra Pradesh as illegal, arbitrary and violative of under Articles 14,19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently, directing the respondents to respect, to implement, to enforce the Orders in Writ Petition No.22567 of 2018 dt.10-07-2018 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the state of Telangana and for the state of Andhra Pradesh and to pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. Dr MAJJI SURI BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief:
“ ... to issue a Writ, Order, or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, challenging the inaction of the respondents in protecting, implementing the Orders in Writ Petition No.22567 of 2018 dt.10-07-2018 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the state of Telangana and for the state of Andhra Pradesh as illegal, arbitrary and violative of under Articles 14,19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently, direct the respondents to respect, to implement, to enforce the Orders in Writ Petition No.22567 of 2018 dt.10-07-2018 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the state of Telangana and for the state of Andhra Pradesh and to pass ...”
Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader on instructions would submit that let there be a direction to respondent No.4 to look into the petitioner’s representation and take an appropriate decision and dispose of this Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders.
Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that petitioner has submitted a representation to the Police for implementation of the order passed in Writ Petition No.22567 of 2018 dated 10.07.2018 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the state of Telangana and for the state of Andhra Pradesh.
Considering the submissions made, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Respondent Police are directed to look into the Petitioner’s representation and
3
taken an appropriate decision according to law and in accordance with the order dated 10.07.2018 passed in WP No.22567 of 2018. No order as to costs.
Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 08.01.2026
4
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Writ Petition No. 897 of 2026
08.01.2026
Mjl /*