Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14650 (RAJ)

SATYANARAYAN ALIAS SONU S/O KHEMRAJ v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/13972/2026 · 2026-09-08

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:36111] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13972/2026 CNR: RJHC020863572026 | URN: CRLMB / 25838U / 2026 Satyanarayan Alias Sonu S/o Khemraj, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Amarpura, Mngrole, Police Station Mangrole, District Baran (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail Baran) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Swati Sharma for Mr. Girish Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP with Mr. Sapan Soni HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 08/09/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.153/2026 registered at Police Station Mangrol, District Baran for offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), and 3(5) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that a cross-case has also been registered at the instance of the petitioner’s side, in which the petitioner has also sustained injuries. He further submits that all the injuries mentioned in the FIR have been found to be neither grievous nor dangerous to life. Petitioner is behind the bars since 20.08.2026 [2026:RJ-JP:36111] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13972/2026] without any criminal past. Charge-sheet has already been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Satyanarayan Alias Sonu S/o Khemraj, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J 44/RASHMI