AJAY MARAIYA ALIAS AJAY MADAIYA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./11236/2025 · 2026-01-14
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14647 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14647 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:880 )
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
---- B.A. No. 11236 of 2025
---- Ajay Maraiya @ Ajay Madaiya, aged about 20 years, son of Chhote Maraiya, resident of village Karkattar, P.O. Sarbhanga, P.S. Mahagama, District-Godda, Jharkhand
….. Petitioner -- Versus --
The State of Jharkhand …... Opposite Party
---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
---
For the Petitioner :- Mr. Md. Zaid Ahmed, Advocate
For the State : Mr. V.S. Sahay, A.P.P
02/14.01.2026 :- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
2. The petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Mahagama P.S. Case No. 190 of 2025, registered under sections 25(1- B) (a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Godda.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner along with Rahul Paswan have been arrested however nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. He next submits that arms has been recovered from the possession of Rahul Paswan. He further submits that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent which is disclosed in para 14 of the petition and he is in custody since 22.09.2025.
4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the petitioner was apprehended on the spot.
5. Considering that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner, the petitioner has got no criminal
( 2026:JHHC:880 )
2
antecedent which is disclosed in para 14 of the petition and he is in custody since 22.09.2025, I am inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, shall be released on regular bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Godda, in connection with Mahagama P.S. Case No. 190 of 2025.
( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dt. 14.01.2026 Satyarthi/