Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
D/L24 18.02.2026 Bpg. dismissed C.R.M. (M) 272 of 2026
In Re: An application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023(B.N.S.S.,2023) corresponding to Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed in connection with Dadpur Police Station Case No.06/2026 dated 08.01.2026 under Sections 69, 351(2)(3) and 316(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita;
Dilip Panday Versus The State of West Bengal & Anr.
Mr. Golam Mastafa Mr. Kazi Asif Iqbal. …for the petitioner.
Mr. Imran Ali Ms. Baishakhi Chatterjee. …for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for 47 days and is an employee of HDFC Bank. According to the learned advocate, both the petitioner and the de facto complainant are major and were able to understand the consequences of their act and action.
Learned advocate for the State produces the case diary and draws the attention of the Court to the statement of the victim under Section 183 of the BNSS.
The investigation of the case is in progress. Having considered the stage of the case, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail.
Petitioner would renew his prayer for bail after the charge-sheet is submitted before the jurisdictional court.
Accordingly, CRM(M)272 of 2026 is dismissed.
2
All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)