1 2026:CGHC:1913-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 85 of 2025 1 - Dileshwar Yadav S/o Mohan Yadav Aged About 46 Years R/o Village Pathrai, Mainpat, Police Station Kamleshwar, Tahsil Narmadapur, District Surguja (C.G.). 2 - Rajkumar Yadav S/o Sobharam Yadav Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Pathrai, Mainpat, Police Station Kamleshwar, Tahsil Narmadapur, District Surguja (C.G.). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). 2 - Rita Ekka D/o Linus Ekka Aged About 49 Years R/o Village Pathrai, Police Station Kamleshwarpur, Tahsil Mainpat, District Surguja (C.G.). ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anurag Singh, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Priyank Rathi, Govt. Advocate. For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Amarnath Pandey, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J. Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 13/01/2026 1. Heard Mr. Anurag Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Priyank Rathi, learned Govt. Advocate, appearing for the Respondent/State, Mr. ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2026.01.14 10:43:17 +0530 2 Amarnath Pandey, learned counsel for the Respondent No.2 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer: "1] That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions quashing the impugned F.I.R. bearing No. 0884/2024 registered at Police Station Ambikapur, District Surguja on 13.12.2024 for the incident occurred on 12.12.2024 and registered on the instance of the respondent No. 2/complainant for the offences punishable under section 296, 351(2), 3(5) of B.N.S and section 3(1) (5) & Section 10 of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. 2] That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief, which it deems fit and proper." 3. The learned State counsel states that after the investigation charge sheet has been filed against the petitioners. 4. In view of the above, the present petition is accordingly dismissed with the liberty to the petitioners to take recourse to law if aggrieved by the charge sheet. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Alok