APHC010011982020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION Between: 1. RALLAPAILI SANDHYA CHALAVADI SANDHYA, W/O.RALLAPALLI VENKATESWARLU, D/O.CHALAVADI RAMESHAM, HINDU, AGED 24 YEARS, R/O.SRINIVASAPURAM VILLAGE, DACHEPALLI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA Court of Andhra Pradesh,Amaravathi (Gurazala Police Station) Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Case, the High Court may be pleased topleased to allow the Revision Petition by setting aside the order .dt.20.11.2019 passed in CRL.M.P.129/2019 in S.C.59/2015 on the file of the Hon'ble X Addl. District Et Sessions Judge, Gurazala and declare the petitioner as Child in Conflict with Law and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay alt further pro Hon'ble X Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Gurazala, during pendency of the Criminal Revision Petition before this Hon'ble Court and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 35/2020 RALLAPAILI SANDHYA CHALAVADI SANDHYA, W/O.RALLAPALLI VENKATESWARLU, D/O.CHALAVADI RAMESHAM, HINDU, AGED 24 YEARS, R/O.SRINIVASAPURAM VILLAGE, DACHEPALLI MANDAL, ...PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, rep. by Public Prosecutor High Court of Andhra Pradesh,Amaravathi (Gurazala Police Station) ...RESPONDENT Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Case, the High Court may be pleased topleased to allow the Revision Petition by setting aside the order .dt.20.11.2019 passed in CRL.M.P.129/2019 in S.C.59/2015 on the file of the Hon'ble X Addl. District Et Sessions Judge, petitioner as Child in Conflict with Law and to pass Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay alt further proceedings in S.C.59/2015 on the file of the Hon'ble X Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Gurazala, during pendency of the Criminal Revision Petition before this Hon'ble Court and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3396] THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA RALLAPAILI SANDHYA CHALAVADI SANDHYA, W/O.RALLAPALLI VENKATESWARLU, D/O.CHALAVADI RAMESHAM, HINDU, AGED 24 YEARS, R/O.SRINIVASAPURAM VILLAGE, DACHEPALLI MANDAL, ...PETITIONER PRADESH, rep. by Public Prosecutor High Court of Andhra Pradesh,Amaravathi (Gurazala Police Station) ...RESPONDENT Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased topleased to allow the Revision Petition by setting aside the order .dt.20.11.2019 passed in CRL.M.P.129/2019 in S.C.59/2015 on the file of the Hon'ble X Addl. District Et Sessions Judge, petitioner as Child in Conflict with Law and to pass Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased ceedings in S.C.59/2015 on the file of the Hon'ble X Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Gurazala, during pendency of the Criminal Revision Petition before this Hon'ble Court and to pass 1. HABIBULLA SHAIK Counsel for the Respondent: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 35/2020 ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Habibulla Shaik, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that no further orders are required to be passed in this matter, as the case against the petitioner in S.C. No. 59 of 2015 on the file of the learned X Additional District and Sessions Judge, Gurazala, has ended in acquittal. 2. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State is in attendance. 3. Be that as it may, this Court is of the view that the impugned order does not warrant interference in the present revision. 4. Recording the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 20.02.2026 KKV HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 51 CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO:35 /2020 Dated 20.02.2026 KKV HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO.: CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 35/2020 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date ORDER OFFICE NOTE 20.02.2026 Dr.VJP,J The Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. (vide separate order) ________ Dr.VJP,J KKV