HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 40281 of 2026 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Rajesh Kumar Jaiswal for the Union of India and Sri Devesh Vikram learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel. 2. If the petitioner is aggrieved with apportionment of the compensation money which had to be divided amongst the legal heirs of the deceased Sundari Devi then the petitioner can always file a representation before the Special Land Acquisition Officer. 3. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has no objection to the filing of a representation and its decision. 4. Under such circumstances, we are of the view that if a fresh representation is filed before the Special Land Acquisition Officer within a period of two weeks from today then the same shall be considered and decided after hearing all the parties concerned in accordance with law within a period two months thereafter. 5. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. October 6, 2026 PK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rahul Kumar Tyagi, Virpratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., C.S.C., Rajesh Kumar Jaiswal (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Smt. Keliya Devi .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 9 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad