SMT. SUSHMA KHANNA v. SMT. RAJWANT KAUR (SINCE DECEASED THROUGH MR. GURPREET SINGH) AND ORS.
RC.REV./250/2026 · 2026-08-13
Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14627 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14627 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010333252026 + RC.REV. 250/2026, CM APPL. 48380/2026 (Stay) & CM APPL. 48381/2026 (Ex.)
SMT. SUSHMA KHANNA
.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajbir Singh Ruhil, Adv. with Mr. Rajesh Khanna, AR of Petitioner
versus
SMT. RAJWANT KAUR (SINCE DECEASED THROUGH MR. GURPREET SINGH) AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anuj Gupta, Adv. with Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Respondent in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR
O R D E R %
13.08.2026
1. The present Petition has been filed by the Petitioner under Section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, assailing the
Order dated 06.11.2025 passed by the learned Additional Rent Controller, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, in ARC No. 149/2017.
2. The son of the Petitioner as well as the Respondent(s), along with their respective counsel, are present in person before this Court. The son has produced a letter of authorisation and the same is taken on record.
3.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties are ad idem This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/08/2026 at 11:41:52
that the disputes inter se the parties have been amicably settled, and in terms thereof, the keys to the subject premises have been handed over by the son of the Petitioner to the Respondent(s), in the presence of this Court.
4. It is further submitted that, in terms of the settlement, the Respondent has paid a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- to the Petitioner by way of bank transfer, the receipt whereof is duly acknowledged by the Petitioner.
5. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, and in terms of which, the keys have been handed over and payment of the agreed amount, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the parties that the matter may be disposed of.
6. Accordingly, the present Petition, along with all pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties.
HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.
AUGUST 13, 2026/v/jk
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/08/2026 at 11:41:52