2026:JHHC:6044 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 1512 of 2020 …… Arun Singh, aged about 58 years S/o Late Basudeo Singh, R/o B.N.Jha Path, Near Ideal School, P.O. & P.S. Deoghar, District-Deoghar, Jharkhand. …. Petitioner(s) -VERSUS- 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar, P.O. & P.S. Deoghar, District-Deoghar, Jharkhand. 3. The Deputy Sub Registrar, Deoghar, P.O. and P.S. Deoghar, District-Deoghar, Jharkhand. 4. The Circle Officer, Deoghar, P.O. and P.S. Deoghar, District-Deoghar, Jharkhand. …..Respondent (s) …… CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajeev Kumar, Adv For the Respondent (s) : Mr. Ranjan Kr., A.C. to Sr. S.C.-I …… 23/16.02.2026 1. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner for the following reliefs; “(A) For the issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the letter no. 1630 dated 30.10.2019 (Annexure-4) whereby the Land Possession Certificate of the land situated in mauza Shyamganj, Khata No. 125/3287 plot no. 532 pare area 5000 Sq. ft. has not been given in favour of the petition on the sole ground that the land is the disputed one and that is why the Land Possession Certificate cannot be issued although regarding the right title no word has been whispered by him. (B) For the issuance of Land Possession Certificate in favour of the petitioner as he is the Power of Attorney holder on behalf of Smt. Suchitra Das, wife of Kajal Das cast Kayasth resident of C/56 Bapuji Nagar, P.O. & P.S. Jadhavpur, Kolkata. (C) For any other relief or, reliefs as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit & proper in the light of the facts of this case.” 2. Mr. Rajeev Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant writ application may be disposed of 2026:JHHC:6044 2 by giving liberty to the petitioner to approach the concerned respondent in view of the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court in L.P.A. No. 58 of 2019 with analogous cases. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent does not have any objection. 4. Having regard to the aforesaid submission, the instant writ application stands disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the respondent No.2. within a period of eight weeks. If any such representation is preferred before the respondent No.2 within the aforesaid stipulated period, the same shall be disposed of in accordance with law, preferably within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the representation. 5. Accordingly, the instant writ application stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J) 16.02.2026 Amardeep/ Uploaded on 12.03.2026