Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14621 (AP)

Duppanapudi Satya Krishna v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/228/2026 · 2026-01-07

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010011602026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: Between: 1. DUPPANAPUDI SATYA KRISHNA, S/O LATE SATYANARAYANA, MALE, AGE, 48YEARS. VIDEO GRAPHER, D.NO.3 RAMALYAM STREET,VELAGALERU VILLAGE, PENUMANTRA MANAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. DUPPANAPUDI KRISHNA VENI, S/O LATE FEMALE, AGE 66YEARS. HOUSE WIFE, D.NO.3 RAMALYAM STREET, VELAGALERUVILLAGE, PENUMANTRA MANAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT BUILIDNG AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. DUPPANAPUDI SEETHARATNAM, W/O SATYA KRISHNA, D/O SUBBA RAO,FEMALE, AGED 43 YEARS, DOCTORGARI BUILDING BEISIDES SACHIVALAYAMPENUMANTRA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. DUPPANAPUDI ANJAMMA, W/O VENKAT YEARS. HOUSEWIFE, R/O D.NO.3 VELAGALERU VILLAGE,PENUMANTRA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. DUPPANAPUDI RAMA KRISHNA, S/O LATE SATYANARAYANA, IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 228/2026 DUPPANAPUDI SATYA KRISHNA, S/O LATE SATYANARAYANA, MALE, AGE, 48YEARS. VIDEO GRAPHER, D.NO.3-45, REDDY RAMALYAM STREET,VELAGALERU VILLAGE, PENUMANTRA MANAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. DUPPANAPUDI KRISHNA VENI, S/O LATE SATYANARAYANA, FEMALE, AGE 66YEARS. HOUSE WIFE, D.NO.3-45, REDDY RAMALYAM STREET, VELAGALERUVILLAGE, PENUMANTRA MANAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT BUILIDNGS. HIGH COURT OF A.P. AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT DUPPANAPUDI SEETHARATNAM, W/O SATYA KRISHNA, D/O SUBBA RAO,FEMALE, AGED 43 YEARS, DOCTORGARI BUILDING BEISIDES SACHIVALAYAMPENUMANTRA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. DUPPANAPUDI ANJAMMA, W/O VENKATA NARAYANA, AGE 65 YEARS. HOUSEWIFE, R/O D.NO.3-45. REDDY RAMALYAM STREET, VELAGALERU VILLAGE,PENUMANTRA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DUPPANAPUDI RAMA KRISHNA, S/O LATE SATYANARAYANA, IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3396] THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA DUPPANAPUDI SATYA KRISHNA, S/O LATE SATYANARAYANA, 45, REDDY RAMALYAM STREET,VELAGALERU VILLAGE, PENUMANTRA SATYANARAYANA, 45, REDDY RAMALYAM STREET, VELAGALERUVILLAGE, PENUMANTRA ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PUBLIC S. HIGH COURT OF A.P. DUPPANAPUDI SEETHARATNAM, W/O SATYA KRISHNA, D/O SUBBA RAO,FEMALE, AGED 43 YEARS, DOCTORGARI BUILDING BEISIDES SACHIVALAYAMPENUMANTRA MANDAL, WEST A NARAYANA, AGE 65 45. REDDY RAMALYAM STREET, VELAGALERU VILLAGE,PENUMANTRA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DUPPANAPUDI RAMA KRISHNA, S/O LATE SATYANARAYANA, AGED 70 YEARSFRUIT VENDOR, R/O D.NO.3-45. REDDY RAMALYAM STREET, VELAGALERUVILLAGE, PENUMANTRA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. DUPPANAPUDI CHANDRA SEKHAR, S/O NOT KNOWN, AGED 50 YEARS.BUILDING CONTRACTOR, R/O D.NO.3-45. REDDY RAMALYAM STREET,VELAGALERU VILLAGE, PENNUMANTRA MANAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtpleased to allow the Criminal Petition by quashing the proceedings in DVC No.4 of 2019 dt.30-08-2019 on the file of the Court of the II Additional Judicial I Class Magistrate, Tanuku and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with the filing of the Certified copy of Domestic Violence Case No.4 of 2019 dt.30-08-2019 on the file of the Court of the II Additional Judicial I Class Magistrate, Tanuku, in the interest of justice. IA NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased Pleased to to stay of all further proceedings in DVC No.4 of 2019 on the file of the Court of the II Additional Judicial I Class Magistrate, Tanuku pending main Criminal Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. I RAVINDRA BABU Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 228/2026 ORDER: The instant Criminal Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., has been filed by the Petitioners/Accused persons, seeking quashment of the proceedings pending against them in DVC No.4 of 2019 dt.30-08-2019 on the file of the Court of the II Additional Judicial I Class Magistrate, Tanuku. 2. Heard Sri I.Ravindra Babu, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mrs.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that petitioner No.1 herein is the husband of respondent No.2 and that petitioner No.2 is the mother of petitioner No.1. He would further submit that the respondent No.2 has made vague allegations against the petitioners in the DVC application without any documentary proof regarding the income of petitioner No.1. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition be disposed of by dispensing with the personal appearance of the petitioners before the Trial Court, considering the age of petitioner No.2. 4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 5. Considering the submissions, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. However, the presence of the petitioner No.2, before the Trial Court is dispensed with, unless her presence is specifically directed by the Trial Court. The petitioner is at liberty to raise all the contentions which are raised in the present petition in her defence before the Trial Court. The learned Trial Judge is directed to dispose of the matter in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, taking into consideration the age of petitioner No.2, and without any further delay. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 08.01.2026 KKV