MURARI S/O GOPI B/C MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN THROUGH PP
CRLW/1067/2018 · 2026-04-02
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1462 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1462 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:13875] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1067/2018 Murari S/o Gopi, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Vill. Rajor Ps Kaila Devi Teh. Karauli Dist. Karauli Raj. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan Through Pp, Raj.
2. Lalo W/o Murari D/o Ghamandi, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Vill. Chainpur Ka Pura Barriya Ps Gurgaon Teh. Karauli Dist. Karauli Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hari Ram Gurjar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 02/04/2026
1. By way of filing the instant petition, a challenged has been led to the impugned order dated 22.03.2018, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Karauli by which the revision petition has been submitted by the respondent No.1 against the order dated 17.03.2015 passed by the Additional Judicial Magistrate, Karauli in Criminal Case No. 53/2013 has been allowed and the directions have been issued to the petitioner to pay maintenance of Rs. 5000/- to the respondent No.1.
2. On last occasion, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No.2 to apprised this Court that the respondent No.2 has passed away.
3. Taking into account the above factual aspect of the matter, this Court vide order dated 13.02.2012 directed the learned Public
[2026:RJ-JP:13875] (2 of 2) [CRLW-1067/2018] Prosecutor to get the aforesaid verified from the concerned S.H.O. Police Station Kudgaon, District Karauli. In pursuance of the aforesaid order dated 13.02.2026. the S.H.O. Police Station Kudgaon, District Karauli has submitted his verification report dated 19.02.2026 wherein, the brother of the respondent No.2 has admitted the death of his sister i.e. respondent Lalo on
05.11.2024. Though, no copy of the death certificate has been provided but this fact has not been denied with regard to death of the respondent No.2.
4. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter, no order is required to be passed, as the proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C. stands abated automatically after the death of the respondent No.2.
5. In view of the above, the instant petition stands disposed of. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, shall also stands dispose of.
6. Verification report dated 19.02.2026 is ordered to be retained on record.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Puneet-Shivam/44