APHC010010692019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 457/2019 Between: 1. M BHARATHI, R/O. MORAVA VILLAGE, TIRUMALAYYAPALLI GRAM PANCHAYAT, VEDURUKUPPAMMANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, YELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, VEDURUKUPPAMMANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toprayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in so far as cancelling the House Site Patta granted in favour of the petitioner in Sy. No. 221/1, Tirumalayyapalli Village vide proceedings No. Roc/C/121/2018, dated 20.11.2018 even without giving any notice is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere 2 with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the house site patta granted to the petitioner and pass such other order or orders IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the operation of cancellation of patta in so far as house site patta which was granted to the petitioner vide proceedings No. Roc/C/121/2018, dated 20.11.2018 of the 4th resondent pending disposal of the Writ Petition. IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to receive the counter copies on record by allowing the leave petition in the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. J M NAIDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT (AP) 3 The Court made the following ORDER: Sri M. Naga Kishore, learned counsel, representing Sri J.M. Naidu, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 02.02.2026 KAS 4 141 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 457/2019 Dated: 02.02.2026 KAS