HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7207 of 2025 Court No. - 35 HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. Present petition has been listed under the heading "Cases Likely to be Infructuous". Office report dated 6.10.2026 indicates that the proceedings before the trial Court out of which present petition has arisen, have been concluded, and in view thereof, the petition has become infructuous. Sri Kuldeep Kumar, counsel appearing for the respondents also states that pursuant to the orders impugned passed in proceedings arising out of S.C.C. Suit, possession of the premises in question has been handed over to the respondent-landlord, and in view of the aforesaid developments, no cause of action survives. Sri Anirudh Upadhyay, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has not disputed the aforestated development. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed. It is, however, observed that in the event any cause of action still survives, it shall be open to the party concerned to move an appropriate application seeking recall of this order. October 6, 2026 Arun K. Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhishek Upadhyay, Anirudh Upadhyay, Nitin Raj Singh, Raj Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Kuldeep Kumar (Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.) Kishan Lal .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad