APHC010013162026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 873/2026 Between: 1. SHAIK SABIHA SULTHANA, W/O SHAIK IBRAHIM, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE R/O D.NO. 7-83 A, TENALI ROAD, 7TH WARD, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDL AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.-522237 2. THE MANGALAGIRI TADEPALLI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.-522503 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR.-522002 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. AYESHA AZMA S Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV The Court made the following: 2 ORDER:- This Writ Petition is filed to declare the action of the 2nd Respondent and their subordinates in marking the Petitioner’s property situated at D.No. 7-83A, Tenali Road, 7th Ward, Mangalagiri, Guntur District and pressurizing the Petitioner to accept TDR bonds. The respondents are taking steps to demolish the same for road widening purposes without following the procedure contemplated under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 and Sections 146 and 147 of the Municipal Corporation Act. 2. During the course of hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the issue involved in this writ petition is covered by the order dated 31.12.2025 passed by this Court in W.P. No.35007 of 2025 and batch, and requested this Court to pass a similar order in the present writ petition. Though no counter has been filed, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent-Corporation fairly submits that the issue is covered by the said order and also submits that case of the petitioner is similarly placed. 3. In view of the same, for the reasons alike in the aforesaid order, this writ petition is also disposed of making it clear to the 2nd respondent that, if any of the petitioner submit in writing her dissent for accepting the T.D.R. bonds offered, the respondents shall have to essentially follow the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. There shall be no order as to costs. 3 4. Registry is directed to annex a copy of the order in W.P.No.35007 of 2025 and batch to the order in the present writ petition. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. ______________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date : 08.01.2026 SR