Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14613 (CHH)

SMT. SNEH PRABHA and ORS. v. SMT. KAMLA BAI and ORS.

SA/314/2001 · 2026-01-04

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:346 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 314 of 2001 1. Smt. Snehprabha aged about 62 years Widow of Mohan Singh 2. Darshan Kumarri aged 22 years D/o Late Mohan Singh 3. Saket Singh aged about 21 years S/o Late Mohan Singh 4. Vishal Singh alias Kishor Singh aged about 19 years S/o Late Mohan Singh All residents of Village Mahroom, Tah, & Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) At present residing at B-6 Rukmini apartment Ambika Nagar, Amrawati (Maharashtra) 444604 ... Appellant(s) versus 1. Smt. Kamla Bai aged about 65 years W/o Bahadur Singh Chouhan, Resident of Village Kodwa, Tah. And Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2. Sushila Bai, aged aobout 60 years, W/o of Munendra Singh, resident of Village Kotri, Distt. Balaghat (M.P.) 3. Smt. Shakun Bai, aged about 50 years, W/o Arjun Singh, Resident of Katiyapara, Juna Bilaspur, Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. Arjun Singh, Aged about 52 years, S/o Vijay Singh Thakur, R/o Katiyapara, Juna Bilaspur (C.G.) 5. State of Chhattisgarh, though Collector Rajnandgaon (CG) ... Respondent(s) For Appellants : Mr. Anand Shukla, Advocate For Respondents No. 3 and 4 : Mr. Sourabh Gupta, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Anand Gupta, Advocate For State : Mr. Anil Pandey, Govt. Advocate Digitally signed by AJINKYA PANSARE Date: 2026.01.05 16:14:59 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Judgment On Board 5.1.2026 1) At the very outset, Mr. Anand Shukla, counsel for the appellant submits that appellants do not wish to pursue this matter and instruction in this regard has been received by him via Whatsapp application today itself. 2) Taking into consideration the submission made by Mr. Shukla, this second appeal stands dismissed. The Whatsapp communication is taken on record. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE A j i n k y a