MD. IRFAN ANSARI ALIAS IRFAN ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./10201/2025 · 2026-02-16
Deepak Roshan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14610 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14610 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:4424
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 10201 of 2025
Md. Ifran Ansari @ Irfan Ansari aged about 21 years, son of Alam Ansari @ Md. Kuddus Ansari @ Kudus Ansari, R/o village Pesrabahiyar, 6 number, P.O Chaitadih, P.S. Pachamba, District Giridih, Jharkhand.
.… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
..... Opposite Party
---------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
---------
For the Petitioner :Mr. Pran Pranay, Adv.
For the Opposite Party : Mr. Rajes Kumar, APP
--------- 03/Dated: 16.02.2026
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 137(2), 64(2)(m), 64(1), 96, 98, 99, 143, 144 of B.N.S. and Section 4, 17, POCSO Act.
3.
Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is languishing in jail since 23.06.2025 and he has been falsely implicated in this case as he is working as a Electric Rickshaw driver and having no criminal antecedent.
4. Per Contra, learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail.
5. Having regard to the gravity of the offence and the allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge this petitioner on bail at this stage. However, petitioner may renew its bail application after six months.
6. Accordingly, the instant bail application stands dismissed.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) February 16, 2026 Uploaded on ……./…../2026
Fahim/