APHC010009562026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 622/2026 Between: 1. ATHOTA KRISHNA KUMARI, W/O. VALLABANENI CHINNA POLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.8-525(5), PANDARIPURAM, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 2. 2. BOMMALA RAMALINGAM,, S/O. YELLAMANDA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/O. DODDAVARAPADU VILLAGE, MADIPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. 3. PERLA SRILAKSHMI,, W/O. SHRAM, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.23-1-61, NEAR RAMALAYAM, GANDHI ROAD, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. 4. DOGIPARTHI RANJATHUKUMAR,, S/O. AMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O. AMMANABROLU VILLAGE, NAGULUPPALAPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. EDARA SYAMALA,, D/O. RACHAMALA VEERA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O. 3RD LINE, SRINAGAR COLONY, KURNOOL ROAD, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 6. 6. ADIMULAM GAYATHRI,, W/O. SUDHAKAR, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.6-98, VENKATESWARA COLONY, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 7. 7. KAMEPALLI PUSHPAVATHI,, W/O. VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.2-30, MAIN ROAD, MANGAMURU VILLAGE, SANTHANUTHALAPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 8. 8. NATHANI HANUMANTHA RAO,, S/O. SUBBARAO, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O. PEDDAKOTHAPALLI VILLAGE, MADHIPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI VILLAGE, TULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE. 3 2 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TALUKA POLICE STATION, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. SRI VIJAYA KRISHNA, S/O. NOT KNOWN, PRESENTLY WORKING AS THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5 5. SMT SUDANAGUNTA SAILAJA, W/O. PANDURANGA RAO, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/O. MUKTHINUTHALAPADU VILLAGE ONGOLE URBAN MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 6 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or orders more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 and 4 in interfering in civil disputes in respect of the house sites of the petitioners Plot Numbers 152, 127, 128, 129, 159, 140, 146, 124, 123, and 158, situated in Sy.Nos.191/3 and Sy.No.255/1B1 of Mukthinuthalapadu Village, Ongole Mandal, Prakasam District, as illegal, arbitrary and violation of 19(1)(g) and 300-A of the Constitution of India and Article 14, consequently, direct the Respondents 3 and 4 not to interfere in civil disputes in respect of the house sites of the petitioners Plot Nos.128, 129, 159, 140, 146, 124, 123, and 158, situated in 152, 127, Sy.Nos.191/3 and Sy.No.255/1B1 of Mukthinuthalapadu Village, Mandal, Prakasam District, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. MADHAVA RAO NALLURI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioners for the following relief: “ ... to issue a writ order or orders more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 and 4 in interfering in civil disputes in respect of the house sites of the petitioners Plot Numbers 152, 127, 128, 129, 159, 140, 146, 124, 123, and 158, situated in Sy.Nos.191/3 and Sy.No.255/1B1 of Mukthinuthalapadu Village, Ongole Mandal, Prakasam District, as illegal, arbitrary and violation of 19(1)(g) and 300-A of the Constitution of India and Article 14, consequently, direct the Respondents 3 and 4 not to interfere in civil disputes in respect of the house sites of the petitioners Plot Nos.128, 129, 159, 140, 146, 124, 123, and 158, situated in 152, 127, Sy.Nos.191/3 and Sy.No.255/1B1 of Mukthinuthalapadu Village, Mandal, Prakasam District, and pass ...” None represented for the Petitioner. Learned Assistant Government Pleader on instructions would submit that no crime is registered against the Petitioners and the subject matter is purely civil in nature and respondent Police never interfered in the civil disputes between the parties and would submit that this Writ Petition may be disposed of by passing appropriate orders. Considering the submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Respondent Police are directed to follow due process of law with regard to the subject matter. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 08.01.2026 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 622 of 2026 08.01.2026 Mjl /*