[2026:RJ-JP:32610] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5809/2026 CNR: RJHC020355342026 | URN: CRLMB / 10393U / 2026 Smt. Rajkumari W/o Shri Amritlal, R/o Gatula, Camera Khurd, Police Station Tetra, District Muraina (Madhya Pradesh). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohit Khanelwal with Mr. Pranav Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP Mr. Gopal Lal ASI, P.S. Mandrail, Distt Karauli. Mr. Anil Vaishnav Mr. Buddhi Prakash HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 17/08/2026 1. The present criminal miscellaneous bail application has been preferred by the accused-petitioner under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.27/2026, registered at Police Station-Mandrail, District-Karauli, for the offences punishable under Sections 108 BNS, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the F.I.R. He also submits that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner of having committed any offence of similar nature or any other nature. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that already the main accused- Amrit Lal, between whom there was allegation of [2026:RJ-JP:32610] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-5809/2026] exchange of money, has already been enlarged on regular bail. He further submits that the petitioner has already participated in the interrogation and has been interrogated by the investigating officer and there is no recovery is to be made from the petitioner. 4. He further submits that the petitioner has been made accused only being a wife of Amrit Lal between with whom and the deceased, there was exchange of money and he further submits that there is no recovery to be made from the petitioner and even there is no requirement of custodial interrogation, therefore he may be enlarged on bail. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as counsel for the complainant, vehemently opposes the anticipatory bail application. 6. The Investigating Officer present in person and states that the interrogation of the petitioner is complete. There is no recovery to be made from the petitioner and even there is no requirement of custodial interrogation, nor any recovery is required to be made. 7. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 8. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, and without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, and particularly the fact that the petitioner has participated in the investigation and the investigation is complete; no recovery is to be made from the petitioner; no requirement of the petitioner for custodial interrogation; there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner of having committed any offence of similar nature or any other nature, further considering the fact that the main accused-Amril lal has already [2026:RJ-JP:32610] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-5809/2026] been enlarged on regular bail, the money transaction has not been alleged against the present petitioner and further considering the fact that she being female, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. 9. Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application filed by the accused-petitioner under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, is allowed. It is directed that, in the event of the arrest of the accused-petitioner, Smt. Rajkumari W/o Shri Amritlal, in connection with FIR No.27/2026, registered at Police Station- Mandrail, District-Karauli, he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) along with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each, to the satisfaction of the concerned Investigating Officer/Station House Officer, subject to the following conditions: (i) The accused-petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by the Investigating Officer as and when required and shall cooperate with the investigation; (ii) The accused-petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat, or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing those facts to the Court or to any Police Officer; (iii) The accused-petitioner shall not leave India without the prior permission of the concerned Court; and (iv) The accused-petitioner is further directed not to take undue advantage of the liberty granted to him or misuse the same. It is made clear that any observations made by this Court in the present bail application are only for the purpose of deciding the [2026:RJ-JP:32610] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-5809/2026] instant application and shall not influence or affect the merits of the case during the course of trial. (BIPIN GUPTA),J 61/JUBIN