APHC010012882026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 1824/2026 Between: 1. K NAGA LAKSHMI, C/O. SRINU, AGED 22 YEARS, R/O. B.C. COLONY, DHARMAVARAM VILLAGE, ADDANKI MANDAL, BAPATIA DISTRICT 2. AVISANA ANURADHA,, W/O. PRABHAKAR REDDY, AGED 40 YEARS, R/O. DHARMAVARAM VILLAGE, ADDANKI MANDAL, BAPATIA DISTRICT. 3. MEDAGAM SUMATHI,, W/O. KOTI REDDY, AGED 34 YEARS,R/O. DHARMAVARAM VILLAGE, ADDANKI MANDAL, BAPATIA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 522237 2. THE DISTRICT PANCHYAT OFFICER, BAPATLA DISTRICT, BAPATLA. 522101 3. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, ADDANKI MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT. - 523201 4. SINGARAKONDA PALEM GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, SINGARAKONDAPALEM VILLAGE, ADDANKI MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 523201 5. THE TAHASILDAR, ADDANKI MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 523201 2 6. MALLELA MADHU, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED 45 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. BUNGALOW ROAD, MADHU COCONUT SHOP, ADDANKI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 523201 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue Writ, Order, Direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 4th and 5th respondents in trying to dispossess the petitioners from the property to an extent of 0.02 cents in survey no. 849 of Kalvakuru Village, Fl/o. Singarakonda palem Grama Panchayat, Addanki Mandal, Bapatia District at the instance of 6th respondent without considering the house site patta granted by the 5th respondent and without considering our representation dated 30.08.2025 is illegal arbitrary, violative of article 300-A of constitution of India and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 4th and 5th respondents not to disposes the petitioners from the property to an extent 0.02 cents in survey no. 849 of Kalvakuru Village, H/o. Singarakonda palem Grama Panchayat, Addanki Mandal, Bapatia District by considering the representation dated 30.08.2025 pending disposal of the above writ petition in the interest of the justice. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. G V S MEHAR KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3. Mattegunta.Sudhir,Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps,M.P.Ps,Gram Panchayats 3 The Court made the following ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent Nos.1 and 2, the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Nos.3 and 4 and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the 5th respondent. 2. This Writ Petition was filed questioning the action of the respondent Nos.4 and 5 in trying to dispossess the petitioners from the property to an extent of Ac.0.02 cents in Sy.No.849 of Kalvakuru Village, H/o. Singarakonda Palem Grama Panchayat, Addanki Mandal, Bapatla District, at the instance of 6th respondent, without considering the house site patta granted by the 5th respondent and without considering the petitioners’ representation dated 30.08.2025. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader, relying upon the written instructions of the 5th respondent dated 22.01.2026, submits that the 5th respondent is not interfering with the petitioners’ land at any point of time. In case, if the land is required for any public purpose, action will be initiated by following the due process of law. 4. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.3 and 4, relying upon the written instructions of the 4th respondent dated 21.01.2026, submits that the respondent Gram Panchayat is not interfering with the peaceful possession of the petitioners and also not issued any notice to the petitioners. Further, there is a property dispute between the petitioners and 4 the 6th respondent, so it is clearly a civil dispute and the Gram Panchayat is not interfering with the same. 5. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, no further orders are necessary in this Writ Petition. If there is any civil dispute between the petitioners and the 6th respondent, the same can be worked out by themselves alternatively in accordance with law. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 29.01.2026 SCH 5 375 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN W.P.No.1824 of 2026 Date: 29.01.2026 SCH