ICICI vs. Raj Kumari and others. CMP No. 7060 of 2026 in FAO No. 41 of 2023 10.04.2026 Present: Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the non-applicant/appellant. Mr. Surinder Saklani, Advocate, for applicants/respondents No. 2 & 3. CMP No. 7060 of 2026 No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-applicant. The non-applicant has no objection in case the amount lying deposited in the Registry of this Court is ordered to be released in favour of the applicants. The award in the case at hand was passed by the Commissioner, Employees’ Compensation (I), Sarkaghat, District Mandi, on 31.08.2022. The appeal preferred against the same was decided on 28th October, 2025. The present application has been preferred by the applicants, Manisha Kumari and Vikram Thakur. Along with the present application, matriculation certificates of the applicants, i.e., Manisha Kumari (respondent No. 2) and Vikram Thakur (respondent No. 3), have been filed. In the award, the applicants have been awarded 30% each, which has been upheld in appeal by a Coordinate Bench. From a perusal of the matriculation certificates appended along with the application, it is evident that both Manisha Kumari and Vikram Thakur have attained the age of majority. In view of the aforesaid, the amount lying deposited in the Registry of this Court, along with proportionate interest accrued thereon, is ordered to be released in favour of the applicants by remitting the same in their respective bank accounts, details whereof have been given at pages 9 and 10 of the paper book (Annexure A-2). The amount be remitted to their bank accounts, subject to proper verification of their identities. Application stands disposed of. (Bipin C. Negi) Judge 10th April, 2026 tarun