Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14597 (GAU)

SAHIN AHMED LASKAR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

AB/2209/2026 · 2026-09-15

Shamima Jahan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010199212026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2209/2026 SAHIN AHMED LASKAR S/O FAKAR UDDIN LASKAR, R/O VILL DAKSHIN MOHANPUR PART 5, PO AND PS KACHUDARAM, DIST CACHAR, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M H LASKAR, MR. S ROY Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN ORDER Date : 16.09.2026 Heard Mr. M. H. Laskar, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. Sarma, the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the state of Assam. 2. By the last order dated 11.09.2026, this Court had directed the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor to get the instructions from the concerned Police Station Page No.# 2/2 as to whether any FIR has been lodged or any information has been received against the petitioner at Kachudaram Police Station, Cachar District. 3. When the matter is called up today, Mr. B. Sarma, the learned APP, has placed on record an instruction dated 11.09.2026 issued by the Officer-in- Charge of Kachudaram Police Station, Cachar, stating that no case or FIR has been lodged against the person namely, Sahin Ahmed Laskar, son of Fakar Uddin Laskar. In view of the aforesaid instruction, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter may be closed. 4. Prayer is allowed. 5. The Anticipatory Bail Application stands closed and the instructions dated 11.09.2026 is placed on record. 6. The Petition stands disposed of. 7. Interim order passed earlier also stands vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant