Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14595 (CHH)

Laxminarayan Girls Higher Secondary School v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

WPL/40/2015 · 2026-01-05

Shri Sachin Singh Rajput

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:789 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPL No. 40 of 2015 1 - Laxminarayan Girls Higher Secondary School Through The Secretary N.G. Roy, S/o Late Shri G.C. Roy, Aged About 80 Years, Bhatkhande Lalit Kala Shikshan Samiti, Gurukul Parishad, Kalibadi Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur C.G., Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors. S/o Through The Secretary, Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur C.G., Chhattisgarh 2 - Employees State Insurance Corporation, Through Its Regional Director, Ramnagar Road, Kota, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur C.G., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - District Education Officer, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur C.G., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sourabh Sharma, Advocate For Respondent Nos. 1 & 3 : Mr. R. K. Gupta, Additional AG For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Pranav Saxena, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput Order On Board 06.01.2026 1. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to agitate the grievances raised in the writ petition before the State authorities by filing a representation. 2. Not opposed. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of granting liberty to the HIFZURRAHMAN ANSARI Digitally signed by HIFZURRAHMAN ANSARI Date: 2026.01.08 10:30:12 +0530 2 petitioner to make a representation before respondent No.1 raising all grounds as urged in this writ petition along with a copy of this petition within 60 days from today. Upon submission of such representation, respondent No.1 is directed to consider and decide the same in accordance with law within an outer limit of 150 days from the date of submission of the representation. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. Interim order granted earlier, if any, stands vacated. Sd/- (Sachin Singh Rajput) Judge H.Ansari