Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010203912026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2798/2026 NOEEM UDDIN @ NAIM UDDIN S/O LT. KAMAR UDDIN, R/O VILL- MOUZKANI, P.O. AND P.S. AND DIST- SRIBHUMI, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A S TAPADER, MR M AHMED,MS. M BEGUM Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN ORDER Date : 17.09.2026 Heard Mr. AS Tapader, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. By this application, the petitioner has sought for bail in connection with Sribhumi PS Case No. 210/2026 registered under Sections61(2)/318(4)/319(2)/308(7)/317(4)/351(2)/351(3)/111/3(5)/3(6) and Page No.# 2/3 3(9) of BNS, 2023. The FIR in connection with which the petitioner was arrested on 05.09.2026 was lodged by the police personnel of DSB, Sribhumi District stating inter alia that a group of persons including the petitioner without any authority or without any professional qualification had taken a position in and around the precincts of the Sribhumi Police Station and making a livelihood from the members who come to the said Police Station. It is further stated that the group including the petitioner use to lure the person who comes to the Police Station and makes them filed the FIR or reach settlement and gives advice to them and as a result of the same, they take money from the persons. 3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the FIR contains all vague allegations without any specific allegation against the petitioner or anyone else and on the same, he submits that the person was arrested and is put behind the bars. 4. Mr. B. Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, however, submits that the allegations in the FIR is serious in nature and the petitioner is stated to be involved in the same and as such he prays for calling of the Case Diary. 5. Upon consideration of the submissions made by the learned Counsel for the parties, more so, in view of the fact that no specific allegation is made against the petitioner neither any person is mentioned to have been victimized by the petitioner, this Court deems it fit to enlarge the petitioner on bail on furnishing of bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with one local surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of CJM, Sribhumi, under the following conditions: i) the petitioner will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when Page No.# 3/3 called for. ii) the petitioner will not hamper, tamper with the evidence, neither influence the witnesses connected with the case. iii) the petitioner will not leave the place of jurisdiction without the permission of the concerned Court. 6. Petition is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant