HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33896 of 2026 Court No. - 65 HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J. 1. Heard Sri Yogesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Ajay Kumar Singh, learned AGA for the State. 2. The instant bail application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.73 of 2021, under Sections 302 and 120-B IPC, Police Station Kakod, District Bulandshahr, during pendency of the trial. 3. At the very outset, learned AGA submits, apart from the present case applicant is having criminal history of 24 other cases, including four cases of murder and five cases of attempt to murder but in the instant bail application, applicant did not explain his criminal history. 4. At this stage learned counsel for the applicant submits, applicant did not conceal the fact that he is not having any other criminal history but as at the time of filing the instant bail application he was not having details of the same, therefore, he could not disclose his criminal history in the instant bail application and specific averment in this regard has been made in paragraph 31 of the affidavit filed in support of the instant bail application. 5. Considering the submission made by the rival parties, it reflects that applicant willfully concealed his criminal history and in paragraph 31, he only made following averments: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kaushal Kishor Pandey, Yogesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sachin Khedi .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) "...31. That, the applicant has a criminal history, which shall be fully explained and brought on record by filing a supplementary affidavit at a later stage/prior to the final hearing of the present bail application." 6. The law is settled that a person who has not come with the clean hands should not get any benefit from the court. 7. Considering the fact that applicant tried to conceal his long criminal history, having number of cases of murder and attempt to murder, in the considered view of this Court, applicant does not deserve any indulgence of this court. 8. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant bail application is rejected. 9. It is clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the facts brought in by the parties pertaining to the disposal of bail application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case during trial. October 6, 2026 S.A. BAIL No. 33896 of 2026 2 (Sameer Jain,J.) Digitally signed by :- SALMAN AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad