Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010203382026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2777/2026 FUZAIL AHMED SON OF FAKRUL ISLAM RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KUDRAKHANDI PS AND DIST SRIBHUMI, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H R CHOUDHURY, Z HUSSAIN,MS G TALUKDAR Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN ORDER Date : 17.09.2026 Heard Mr. HR Choudhury, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. By this application, the petitioner has sought for bail in connection with Sribhumi PS Case No. 210/2026 registered under Sections61(2)/318(4)/319(2)/308(7)/317(4)/351(2)/351(3)/111/3(5)/3(6)/3(9) Page No.# 2/3 of BNS, 2023. The FIR in connection with which the petitioner was arrested and is put behind the bars since 05.09.2026 was lodged by the police personnel of DSB, Sribhumi District stating inter alia that a group along with the petitioner were acting in criminal conspiracy with one another and with some unknown persons and with common intention and common object are carrying on operations in and around the Sribhumi Police Station. It was stated that petitioner along with others without any authority or any professional qualification had been luring the public into filing of an FIR or entering into a settlement and had also given deceitful advise and take money from the public. 3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the FIR lodged against the petitioner was a vague FIR and no specific allegation is made against the petitioner or anyone else. 4. Mr. B. Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, however, submits that the Case Diary be called in order to see the entire gamut of the case and to see the complicity of the petitioner in the various offence mentioned in the said FIR. 5. Upon consideration of the submissions made by the learned Counsel for the parties, more so, in view of the fact that no specific allegation has been mentioned against the petitioner together with no mention about any person being victimized, this Court deems it fit to enlarge the petitioner on bail on furnishing of bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with one local surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of CJM, Sribhumi, under the following conditions: i) the petitioner will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when called for. Page No.# 3/3 ii) the petitioner will not hamper, tamper with the evidence, neither influence the witnesses connected with the case. iii) the petitioner will not leave the place of jurisdiction without the permission of the concerned Court. 6. Petition is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant