Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14581 (JHR)

CHARLES TUDU v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./2523/2026 · 2026-03-26

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:8632 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 2523 of 2026 Charlesh Tudu, aged about 24 years, son of Khela Tudu, resident of Telo, Bada Biyansi, P.O. and P.S.- Borio, District- Sahibganj … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mrs. Sweta Singh, APP --- 02/26.03.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 15.06.2025 in connection with Borio P.S. Case No. 53 of 2024 corresponding to S.T. No. 298 of 2025, for the offences registered under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. 2023 pending in the court of learned Sessions Judge, Sahibganj. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that bail application of the petitioner was earlier rejected by a co-ordinate Bench of this court vide order dated 13.11.2025 in B.A. No. 8236 of 2025. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was having illicit relationship with the wife of the deceased and brother of the informant namely Vijay Baski died due to poisoning. The impugned order passed by the learned court reveals that out of 6 charge sheeted witnesses, 4 have already been examined. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer. 5. Considering the fact that trial is at fag end and the bail application of the petitioner rejected earlier, this court is not inclined ( 2026:JHHC:8632 ) 2 to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner above named is rejected. 6. The State is directed to ensure prompt production of witnesses. 7. The counsel for the State is directed to communicated this order to the Superintendent of Police of the concerned District and also to the Director, Prosecution. 8. Let this order be communicated to the court concerned through FAX. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 26.03.2026 Uploaded on: 28.03.2026 Binit/