APHC010011212026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NOs.666 of 2026 and WP.No.666 of 2026 Between: Alumolu Srinivasa Reddy, and Others The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. G VENKATA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS WP.No. 670 of 2026 Between: Pittu Brahma Reddy and Others The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. G VENKATA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following : IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NOs.666 of 2026 and 670 of 2026 Alumolu Srinivasa Reddy, and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): G VENKATA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP FOR REVENUE GP FOR ENDOWMENTS Pittu Brahma Reddy and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): G VENKATA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following : IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N 670 of 2026 ...PETITIONER(S) ...RESPONDENT(S) ...PETITIONER(S) ...RESPONDENT(S) 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.666 and 670 of 2026 COMMON ORDER : 1. The petitioners are aggrieved by the action of the respondents in trying to dispossess the petitioners from their property, for which they are in occupation. It is also admitted that the petitioners are in occupation of the 4th respondent temple properties. 2. The learned standing counsel appearing for the 4th respondent on instructions submits that the petitioners were issued notices and appropriate action would be taken against the encroachers. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and also the learned standing counsel for the 4th respondent. Perused the material on record. 4. Admittedly, the petitioners are not filed any documents to claim their title over the property and admittedly there are in occupation of the temple property. Hence, this Court is not inclined to grant any relief in favour of the petitioners. 5. Accordingly, the writ petitions are dismissed. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N KGM 3 85 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.666 and 670 of 2026 Dated 07.01.2026 KGM