CRL OP No. 7599 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 7599 of 2026 Ravi Gopal ..Petitioner(s) Vs State rep by its Sub Inspector of Police Tirupattur Police Station, Tirupattur District. Crime No. 42/2026 ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023 to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner in the event of his arrest in connection with the case in Crime No. 42/2026 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s): Ms.S.S.Meenakumary For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Dhileepan, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 318(2) and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) Act, 2023 and Section 34(2) of the National Medical Commission Act, 2019 in Crime No.42 of 2026, on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. 2. It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioner was practising https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 7599 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 6 allopathy medicine without any valid degree. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the de-facto complainant. He further submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent Police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioner is only an insurance agent and not a Doctor by profession. Upon inspection conducted by the District Chief Medical Officer, the fraud played by the petitioner was found out. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. I have given my anxious consideration to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. 6. Though there is a serious allegation against the petitioner, considering the totality of the circumstances and nature of allegation put forth against the petitioner and the date of registration of the First Information Report, this Court is of the view that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required. Hence, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 7599 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 6 subject to certain conditions. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Tirupattur, Tirupattur District, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only), with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, and on further conditions: (a) If the petitioner fails to surrender before the concerned learned Magistrate within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled; (b) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the application for surety ship (Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019]'. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identify proofs to ensure their identity; (c) The petitioner shall report before the respondent Police, everyday at 10.30 a.m. and 5.30 pm., for a period of fifteen days and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation; (d) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate actions against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 7599 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 6 anticipatory bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji v. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; (e) If the petitioner thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS Act. 25-03-2026 rap https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 7599 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 6 To 1. The Sub Inspector of Police Tirupattur Police Station, Tirupattur District. 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. 3. The Judicial Magistrate No.2, Tirupattur, Tirupattur District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 7599 of 2026 __________ Page6 of 6 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. rap CRL OP No. 7599 of 2026 25-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis