[2026:RJ-JP:34796] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9098/2026 CNR: RJHC020558012026 | URN: CRLMB / 16662U / 2026 Kuldeep Sain Son Of Late Lalchand Sain, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Tijara, Police Station Tijara, District Khairthal (At Present Confined In Sub District Jail, Bayana) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhishek Jhingonia For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP Mr. Vinod Kumar, S.H.O., P.S. Roopbas, Bharatpur HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Order 31/08/2026 1. This misc. bail application has been filed by the petitioner Kuldeep Sain S/o Late Lalchand Sain, aged about 27 years, who was arrested by the police in connection with the FIR bearing No.126/2026 dated 12.04.2026 registered at Police Station Roopbas, District Bharatpur for the offences punishable under Sections 318(2), 318(4) and 316(2) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 66C and 66D of IT Act, 2008. 2. Learned counsel submits that the bail application filed by the petitioner was rejected by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Roopbas, Dist. Bharatpur, (Raj.) vide order dated 01.06.2026, thereafter, the petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S, 2023. [2026:RJ-JP:34796] (2 of 5) [CRLMB-9098/2026] 3. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case on the fact that a sum of Rs. 39,000/- was transferred to his account. He further submits that the petitioner has not criminal antecedents of any nature in the past and is behind the bars from 11.05.2026 in connection with the impugned FIR registered against him on 12.04.2026. Learned counsel further submits that police after conducting the investigation, has filed the charge-sheet and no more recovery is required to be made from the petitioner herein. Learned counsel informed that petitioner's business account has been freezed by the police during the course of investigation. In view thereof, learned counsel prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor along with Investigating Officer present before this Court strongly oppose the bail application, however, he could not dispute the fact that petitioner has no criminal antecedents of any nature in the past of I.T. Act. 5. Considering the nature of the allegations as mentioned in the FIR, noting that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents of similar nature, he is behind the bars since long and trial will take considerable long time to conclude, without commenting upon merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to exercise its power under Section 483 B.N.S.S. and deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Kuldeep Sain S/o Late Lalchand Sain shall be released on bail on the following conditions:- [2026:RJ-JP:34796] (3 of 5) [CRLMB-9098/2026] 1. Accused-petitioner shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs 50,000 each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. 2. Within 15 days from the date of this order, the accused- petitioner shall file an affidavit before the trial Court/ I.O. disclosing the following details: - (i) Moveable and immovable assets which includes land, buildings, vehicles, deposits, investments all bank accounts and digital wallets, UPI IDs cryptocurrency holdings etc. allegedly used in commission of the offence or which the accused-petitioner has in his name. (ii) The accused-petitioner shall submit complete transaction statements of all his active bank accounts, UPI IDs and digital payment instruments etc. after every 30 days till completion of the trial to the IO. 3. The accused shall not obtain/use any new SIM card, mobile phone or open new bank account etc. without the prior intimation to the Investigating Officer. 4. The accused-petitioner shall surrender his passport, if he has, before the trial Court immediately after being released on bail. The accused-petitioner shall not leave India without the prior permission of the trial Court. 5. The accused-petitioner shall not use any Virtual Private Network (VPN), TOR Browser, Proxy Server or any other form of anonymous network or identity masking technology without permission of IO. 6. The accused-petitioner shall submit to the Investigation Officer a comprehensive list of all electronic devices in his [2026:RJ-JP:34796] (4 of 5) [CRLMB-9098/2026] possession, including mobile phones, laptops, tablets, external hard disks and pen drive along with his IMEI numbers and serial numbers within 15 days of release under this bail order. 7. The accused-petitioner shall provide to the Investigating Officer details of all social media accounts, e-mail accounts, domain registration, websites and online platforms operated or used by the accused-petitioner. 8. The accused-petitioner shall not create any social media account in the name of any person, domain name or website without the prior intimation to the Investigation Officer. 9. The accused-petitioner shall mark his presence before the concerned police station once in 15 days as fixed by the Investigating Officer and a register shall be maintained for the same by Investigating Officer. 10. In case of any change of residential address, the accused- petitioner shall immediately inform the Investigating Officer as well as the trial Court. 11. The accused-petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer whenever called upon and shall fully co-operate with the investigation. 12. The accused-petitioner shall not tamper with evidence, influence witnesses or attempt to obstruct the investigation in any manner whatsoever. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, failure to provide above information or such other information as desired by IO, shall be treated as a violation of the bail conditions and further if the accused-petitioner is found to be involved in similar such [2026:RJ-JP:34796] (5 of 5) [CRLMB-9098/2026] cases within three years from the date of passing of this order, the public prosecutor shall move an application for cancellation of bail. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J 49/RINCHU