Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14569 (CAL)

PANCHANAN KHASKEL v. WBSEDCL AND ORS

WPA/6631/2026 · 2026-04-01

Ravi Krishan Kapur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

18 01.04.2026 Ct. No.07 J.Das IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE WPA 6631 of 2026 Sri Panchanan Khaskel Vs. WBSEDCL and Ors. Mr. Sujit Bhuniya Mr. Pradip Paul Ms. Renesa Dey … For the petitioner Mr. Supriyo Chattopadhyay Mr. Debosri Chatterjee …For the WBSEDCL 1. It is submitted on behalf of the WBSEDCL that a cheque for Rs.53,329/- has been handed over to the petitioner. This fact is admitted by the petitioner. 2. In view of the subsequent events which have transpired after filing of the writ petition i.e. the above payments nothing further survives in this proceeding, WPA 6631 of 2026 stands dismissed. 3. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to file a fresh suit for any other monetary claim. 4. The question of the validity of the order passed by the Ombudsman dated 1 September 2015 is not gone into. (Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.)