Balachandran @ Bala, M/A 43 (A-2) v. The State rep. by The Inspector of Police,
/5494/2026 · 2026-03-11
C Kumarappan
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14568 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14568 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 5494 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 11-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 5494 of 2026 Balachandran @ Bala, M/A 43 (A-2) No 5 Mariyamman Koil Street Andiyarpalayam Madugadipet Villianur Taluk Puducherry. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Valavanur Police Station Villupuram District (Cr.No. 674 of 2024) ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, to enlarge the accused/petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest pending investigation in Valavanur PS Cr.No. 674/2025 on the file of the respondent police and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): U.Yuvaraj For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Dhileepan Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 274, 275, 123 of BNS and 24(1) of COTPA Act, 2003 in Crime No.674 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that on 30.10.2024 when the police were on patrol duty, the Accused No.1 was found in possession of 15 Hans small https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 5494 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 pockets in 10 pouches, 9 Cool Lip Filter small pockets in 8 pouches, 10 Vimal small pockets in 30 pouches, 10 V-1 small pockets in 30 pouches. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that this is the second anticipatory bail petition and the earlier petition was dismissed by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.29747 of 2025 dated 31.10.2025; the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for the grant of anticipatory bail. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent reiterated the prosecution's case, stating that 8 previous cases are pending against the petitioner, the petitioner is arrayed as A2. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel on either side, it is noted that a huge quantity of banned tobacco products was recovered and 9 previous cases are pending against the petitioner, hence this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.
11-03-2026 MPA https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 5494 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 To 1.The Inspector of Police, Valavanur Police Station Villupuram District (Cr.No. 674 of 2024) 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 5494 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. MPA CRL OP No. 5494 of 2026 11-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis