Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14566 (AP)

Kommireddy Suryanarayana v. J.V.S. N. Prasad

CC/1911/2015 · 2026-02-23

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010009212015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1911/2015 Between: 1. KOMMIREDDY SURYANARAYANA,, S/O. RANGA RAO, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, 0CC: MANAGER (EXECUTIVE OFFICER), SRI VIJAYA GOPALA SWAMY TEMPLE, SIDDANTHAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. J V S N PRASAD, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. Y V ANURADHA, THE DOMMOSSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, TILAK ROAD, ABIDS, HYDERABAD. 3. D BRAMHARAMBHA, THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. P PAPARAO, SRI MALLESWARAM GROUP OF TEMPLES, MALLESWARAM, PERVALLI, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents herein under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for willfuily, deliberately and intentionally not implementing the order of this Hontie Court passed in in WP No. 12181Laf 2015, dated: 28.04.2015 by His Lordship Sri Justice Nooty Ramamohana Rao, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 2 1. J SUDHEER Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP) 2. ELEVATED AS JUDGE The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1911/2015 ORDER:- The instant contempt case has been filed alleging the violation of the interim order of this Court passed in W.P.No.12181 of 2015, dated 28.04.2015. 2. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel representing Sri J. Sudheer, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that in view of the subsequent events taken up in the lis, the petitioner is not inclined to pursue the present contempt case. 3. Recording the above said submission, the contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 24.02.2026 SCH 4 286 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Contempt Case No.1911 of 2015 Date: 24.02.2026 SCH