HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9348 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. Counter affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Bhupendra Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Parvesh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the informant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record. 3. The present application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime No. 339 of 2026, under Section 191(2), 103(1), 61(2) of B.N.S., Police Station - Handia, District Commissionerate Prayagraj, with a prayer to grant her anticipatory bail. 4. At the very outset, learned A.G.A. submits that the final report has been submitted in the present matter on 30.09.2026, therefore, there is no apprehension of arrest of the applicant. In the changed circumstances, the present anticipatory bail application is not maintainable. 5. On being confronted with this fact, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the present anticipatory bail application be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a fresh anticipatory bail application at the appropriate stage, if so required. 6. With the aforesaid liberty, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not maintainable. 7. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. October 6, 2026 A.P. Pandey Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Bhupendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Parvesh Kumar Pandey (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) Gayika Sumitra Nandani .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND PRAKASH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad