Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14564 (KAR)

SMT. SHARADHAMMA v. SRI VENKATAPPA

WP/7474/2026 · 2026-03-11

H T Narendra Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14947 WP No. 7474 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7474 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SHARADHAMMA W/O LATE PUTTASWAMY AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS 2. SMT. KAMALAMMA W/O LATE PUTTASWAMY AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS 3. SRI. SHASHI KUMAR S P S/O LATE PUTTASWAMY AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS PETITIONERS NO.1 TO 3 ARE RESIDING AT NO.10 HAROHALLI THALUK BANGALORE SOUTH DISTRICT. 4. SRI. SANTHOSH KUMAR S P S/O LATE PUTTASWAMY AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS (DECEASED ON 3.5.2025) 5. SMT. JYOTHI W/O SRI. RAGHU KUMAR AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS RESIDING AT DEVARAHOSAHALLI VILLAGE NELAMANGALA, BANGALORE RURAL BANGALORE-562 111. 6. SMT. MANGALAMMA W/O SRI. NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS RESIDING AT BURUGAMARADA PALYA MYDALA POST, TUMKUR-572 104. Digitally signed by DHANALAKSHMI MURTHY Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14947 WP No. 7474 of 2026 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. LOKESHA D., ADVOCATE) AND: SRI VENKATAPPA S/O KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS RESIDING AT SIDDAPURA VILLAGE HAROHALLI HOBLI AND THALUK BANGALORE SOUTH DISTRICT-562 112. …RESPONDENT THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED IN THE IA NO.2 DATED 02/05/2025 PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-A IN THE SUIT IN OS.NO.546/2024 PENDING CONSIDERATION BEFORE THE HON’BLE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KANAKAPURA, BANGALORE SOUTH DISTRICT AND GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEFS. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioners filed a memo dated 11.03.2026 seeking leave of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file a Miscellaneous First Appeal. 2. The memo is taken on record. 3. This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the appropriate legal forum, if law permits. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE CM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 79