Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14563 (AP)

P. Sivalingappa v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/917/2026 · 2026-01-07

D Ramesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010011042026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] THURSDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 917/2026 Between: 1. P. SIVALINGAPPA,, S/O. P. PATHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O .HBN COLONY, NIDRAGATTA VILLAGE, AMALAPURAM MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT ERSTWHILE ANANTAPUR DISTRICT - 533218. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI - 522237. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT., AT PUTTAPARTHY, ERSTWHILE ANANTAPUR DISTRICT - 515134. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MADAKASIRA DIVISION, MADAKASIRA, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT ERSTWHILE ANANTAPUR DISTRICT - 515301. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, AMARAPURAM MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE ANANTAPUR DISTRICT - 533218. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an order, writ or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India questioning the action of the respondents in seeking dispossession of the petitioner from his property an extent of Ac.0.50 cents in Sy.No.62-1 and an extent of Ac.2.30 cents in Sy.No.61-1 in total Ac.2.80 cents situated at Nidragatta Village Polam, Nidragatta Village, Amalapuram Mandal, Sri Satya Sai District Erstwhile Anantapur District without following any procedure under law and without issuing any notice or any proceedings as illegal, arbitrary and against to principles of natural justice and against to principles of natural justice and violative of Article 14,21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the above said property without following due process of law IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from his property an extent of Ac.0.50 cents in Sy.No.62-1 and an extent of Ac.2.30 cents in Sy.No.61-1 in total Ac.2.80 cents situated at Nidragatta Village Polam, Nidragatta Village, Amalapuram Mandal, Sri Satya Sai District Erstwhile Anantapur District, pending disposal of writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NARAHARI BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “…to issue an order writ or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India questioning the action of the respondents in seeking dispossession of the petitioner from his property an extent of Ac 0 50 cents in Sy No 621 and an extent of Ac 2 30 cents in Sy No 611 in total Ac 2 80 cents situated at Nidragatta Village Polam Nidragatta Village Amalapuram Mandal Sri Satya Sai District Erstwhile Anantapur District without following any procedure under law and without issuing any notice or any proceedings as illegal arbitrary and against to principles of natural justice and against to principles of natural justice and violative of Article 14 21 and 300A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the above said property without following due process of law...” 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has able to release on the registered document as well as revenue records which reflecting the name of the petitioner, the said records downloaded from recent.. dispute having the respondent authorities trying to dispose subject property. 3. Reply to the said contention the learned Government Pleader has made submissions passed written instructions submitted by the Tahsildar, dated 07.01.2026 according to the said instructions originally the land in an extent of Ac.0.50 cents in Sy.No.62-1 and Ac. 2.30 cents and Sy. No.61-1 in total an extent of Ac.2.80 cents was classified as Government Dry and recorded in the name of Chikka Hanumappagari Gujjari as per RSR Nidragatta Village. 4. Further, as seen from the para no.4 of the affidavit copy, the petitioner alleged that the staff of this office are trying to dispossess him without following due procedure of law. In this connection, this authority or staff of this office have never entered into the property of the petitioner and never tried to dispossess him and also not even issued notices to the petitioner. 5. Recording the said statement, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. ______________________________________ JUSTICE D RAMESH 08.01.2026 rmd 241 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 917/2026 08.01.2026 rmd