Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14561 (MAD)

S.VINCENT VINOTHRAJ v. The Deputy commissioner of Labour

WP/9602/2026 · 2026-03-12

M Dhandapani

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 9602 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI WP No. 9602 of 2026 and WMP.No.10354 of 2026 S.Vincent Vinothraj S/O.K.Saman Lane Street, Mappedu village and post Thiruvallur District -631 402 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Deputy commissioner of Labour (conciliation-2) No.58/39,Rajaji salai, Vawoo Mansion 7th floor Chennai-600 001 2. The Joint Director Industrial Safety and health No.6/11 and 12,Lal bhagadur sastri Street 2nd floor, Periakuppam Thiruvallur District-602 001 3. The Management Leewon Precision Private Ltd No.137, Vayalur village Sriperumandur via Thiruvallur District -602 105 ..Respondent(s) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 9602 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 5 Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to re enquire the issue raised by the petitioner in letter dated 12.11.2025 and give fresh report after inspection of 3rd respondent company. For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.T.Varadarajalu For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Murthi, GA for R1 & R2 ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the second respondent to re-enquire the issue raised by the petitioner in letter dated 12.11.2025 and to give a fresh report after inspection of the third respondent company. 2. Heard the learned counsels appearing on either side. With the consent of both sides, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing at the admission stage itself. Since no adverse order is to be passed in the Writ Petition as against the third respondent, notice to the third respondent is dispensed with. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the third respondent forced the members of the petitioner’s Union to operate two machines instead of one machine as per the Employees Regulations and thereby a dispute was raised under Section 2K of the Industrial Disputes Act before the first respondent and the same is pending. He further submitted that there may https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 9602 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 5 be a direction to the first respondent to re-enquire the issue raised by the petitioner in letter dated 12.11.2025, within a reasonable time. 4. In view of the limited prayer sought for by the petitioner in this Writ Petition, there shall be a direction to the first respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 12.11.2025 and to pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 12-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No DP https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 9602 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 5 To 1. The Deputy commissioner of Labour (conciliation-2) No.58/39,Rajaji salai, Vawoo Mansion 7th floor Chennai-600 001 2. The Joint Director Industrial Safety and health No.6/11 and 12,Lal bhagadur sastri Street 2nd floor, Periakuppam Thiruvallur District-602 001 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 9602 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 5 M.DHANDAPANI, J. DP WP No. 9602 of 2026 12-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis