Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14559 (BOM)

VIVEK SANJAY THAKUR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

CP/272/2020 · 2026-10-01

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(1) 909 CP-272.2020.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 909 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 272 OF 2020 IN WP/5206/2020 VIVEK SANJAY THAKUR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS --------------------------------------------------------------------------- None for the petitioner. Mr. G.A. Kulkarni, A.G.P. for respondent-State. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATED : 1st October, 2026 Per Court : 1. None for the petitioner. 2. It appears that after order dated 25th September 2020, the petitioner did not turn up for taking circulation. He also did not supply copies for issuance of notice to the concerned respondents. Even otherwise also, the direction in the writ petition is to decide the caste claim of the petitioner, which, by the passage of time must have been decided. 3. As such, nothing survives in this petition and it stands disposed of. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE VD_Dhirde