- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19877 WP No. 28317 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 28317 OF 2023 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. ARULAPPA R S/O LATE RAJENDRA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS. 2. SMT. JAMUNA A W/O ARULAPPA R AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS. BOTH ARE R/AT KIRAGASURU VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, CHAMARAJANAGAR TALUK AND DISTRICT - 571 313. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. CHIDANANDA KUMAR M.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER AADHAR HOUSING FINANCE LTD., CORPORATED OFFICE NO. 802, NATARAJ NATARAJ BAI RUSTUMJI, WESTERN EXPRESS HIGHWAY, SIR M V ROAD, ANDHERI EAST, MUMBAI - 400 069. REPRESENTED BY THE AUTHORISED OFFICER. Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19877 WP No. 28317 of 2023 2. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER AADHAR HOUSING FINANCE LTD., CPSU 66010 KA 190 PLC 011409, NO.3, 2ND STAGE, JCVT TOWERS, 8TH A MAIN ROAD, S R NAGAR, BANGALORE 560 027. REP. BY THE AUTHORISED OFFICER. 3. AADHAR HOUSING FINANCE LTD MYSORE BRANCH, NO. 2742, 1ST FLOOR, TEMPLE ROAD, V V MOHALLA, MYSORE - 570 002. REP. BY AUTHORISED OFFICER. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.NANDINI G.,ADVOCATE FOR R3; R1 & R2 ARE SERVED & UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD 07.01.2022 PASSED IN CRL MISC NO. 54/2021 PASSED BY SENIOR THE CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT CHAMARAJANAGARA VIDE ANNX-D AND SET ASIDE THE PAPER PUBLICATION DATED 19.09.2021 PUBLISHED IN SAMYUKTHA KARNATAKA KANNADA DAILY PUBLISHED FOR SYMBIOTIC POSSESSION OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY ISSUED BY THE R-3 HEREIN AT ANNX-C AT SL NO. 6 CONCERNED TO PETITIONER. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19877 WP No. 28317 of 2023 ORAL ORDER This writ petition is filed in the year 2023. When the matter came up on 08.04.2026, as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption 'dismissal' today. 2. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Hence, it appears that the petitioners are not interested to pursue the matter. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE MEG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 64