SRI RUTANG BHARGAV TRIPATHI @ TRIPATHI R B v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
Bail Appln./240/2026 · 2026-03-08
Rajesh Mazumdar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1455 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1455 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010011242026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./240/2026 SRI RUTANG BHARGAV TRIPATHI @ TRIPATHI R B S/O- SRI BHARGAV TRIPATHI, PERMANENT RESIDENT OF 21 NABANIT PARK, NEAR MONISH CHAR RASTA, P.S. AKOTA, DIST.- BARODA, GUJRAT, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT- N.N. DUTTA ROAD, SILCHAR, P.O. AND P.S.
SILCHAR, DIST.- CACHAR, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY PP ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR T H HAZARIKA, MR. K ISLAM,MR A RASHID,MR M CHETIA,MS. S YASMIN,MR. M SHARMA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER 09.03.2026 Heard Mr. T.H. Hazarika, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R.J. Baruah, learned APP for the State. This Court had granted interim relief to the petitioner by order dated
Page No.# 2/2 04.02.2026, directing that the petitioner be released on interim bail in connection with Silchar P.S. Case No. 1100/2025 under Sections 316(5)/318(3)/336(3) of the BNS, 2023, on furnishing an appropriate bail bond. The learned APP has submitted that the case diary has been received and that the investigation has sufficiently progressed. There is no allegation that the petitioner has violated any of the terms and conditions stipulated in the earlier bail order. Accordingly, this Court deems it fit to make the bail privilege granted on 04.02.2026 absolute. The petitioner shall abide by the terms and conditions mentioned in the earlier order and shall also participate in the trial as and when he receives summons from the Court. JUDGE Comparing Assistant