Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1455 (CHH)

R.K. MISHRA v. MANAGING DIRECTOR (HUMAN RESOURSE)

WPS/6655/2018 · 2026-01-22

Shri Sachin Singh Rajput

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:4254 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6655 of 2018 1 - R.K. Mishra S/o Late Shri B.K. Mishra, Aged About 71 Years R/o A-19 Vidya Vihar, Nehru Nagar (West) Bhilai, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Managing Director (Human Resource) C.S.P.D.C.L. Daganiya Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Bhaskar Payashi and Shri Rohitashva Singh, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Shri Bennoon, Advocate appears on behalf of Shri Raja Sharma, Advocate ({Hon’ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput}) Order on Board 23/01/2026 Challenge in this writ petition is to an order dated 20/06/2018 (Annexure P/1 by which the pension of the petitioner was withheld permanently. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was working with the respondent on the post of Chief Engineer with the respondent. Crime No.40/2000 under Section 13 (1) (Ã), 13 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 was registered against him by the Special Police Establishment, Lokayukt, Bhopal, M.P. He retired on attaining the age of superannuation on 30/06/2005 from the post of Chief Engineer, T&D. After retirement, charge sheet of the abovestated offences was presented before the Special Judge, P.C. Act, 2 Rajnandgaon, C.G. on 29/03/2011 and vide order dated 21/01/2018, the petitioner was convicted for 2 years under Section 13 (ii) of the P.C.Act and was imposed with fine of Rs.25,000/-, in default, 6 months rigorous additional imprisonment. Thereafter, vide impugned order (Annexure P/1), as he was punished, his pension was withheld permanently. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the order of conviction of the petitioner, criminal appeal is presented before this Court i.e. Cr.A.No.377/2018, which is pending consideration. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during pendency of the writ petition, the sole petitioner has passed away. Thus, at present, this petition may be disposed off with liberty in favour of the legal representatives of the deceased petitioner to file a fresh petitioner after disposal of Cr.A.No.377/2018. 4. Not opposed by the other side. 5. Reserving liberty as aforesaid, this writ petition is disposed off. Sd/- ({Sachin Singh Rajput}) JUDGE Deepti DEEPTI HARIKUMAR Digitally signed by DEEPTI HARIKUMAR Date: 2026.01.27 13:34:44 +0530