Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14546 (HP)

KALU RAM v. SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED

CRMPM/1223/2026 · 2026-07-07

Rakesh Kainthla

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Kalu Ram Vs. M/s Shriram Finance Limited Cr.MP(M) No. 1223 of 2026 7.7.2026 Present: M/s Naveen Kumar and Kiran Kumar, Advocates, for the petitioner. Mr. Ashwani Kaundal, Advocate, for the respondent. Cr.MP(M) No. 1223 of 2026 Learned counsel for the respondent, under instructions, submits that the matter has been compromised between the parties and the respondent/complainant has no objection for allowing the application. In view of this statement, the present application is allowed and the delay of 01 year, 11 months and 05 days in filing the revision is ordered to be condoned. Application stands disposed of. Cr. Revision (ST) No. 5767 of 2026 Since the delay in filing the revision petition has been condoned vide separate order passed in Cr.MP(M) No. 1223 of 2026, the revision petition be registered. Notice. Mr. Ashwani Kaundal, learned counsel appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent. Copy of the petition has been supplied to the learned counsel for the respondent. Learned counsel for the respondent, under instructions, submits that the matter has been compromised between the parties and the respondent/complainant has no objection for allowing the petition. In view thereof, petitioner is directed to deposit 7.5% of the cheque amount before Member, Secretary, H.P. Legal Services Authority, Kasumpti, Shimla, as per the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Sanjabij Tari vs. Kishore S. Brocar and another (2025) SCC Online SC 2069 and list the matter thereafter. Cr.MP(ST) No. 5771 of 2025 Notice in the aforesaid terms. It be registered and list along with main petition. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 7th July, 2026 (Chander)