Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010193882026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/939/2026 SANTOSH ODIYA SON OF SRI LAKHIRAM ODIYA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NO.2 BHOLATAR, P.S DIMAKUCHI, DISTRICT UDALGURI, ASSAM - 784526. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR.
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM.
2:BISHNI TOPPO WIFE OF BIREN TOPPO RESIDENT OF VILL. NO. 2 BHOLATAR P.S DIMAKUCHI DISTRICT UDALGURI ASSAM- 784526 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A ATREYA, MR D K BHATTACHARYYA,MR. J KONWAR Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NCHUMBEMO MOZHUI ORDER Date : 16-09-2026 (M. Zothankhuma, J) Heard Mr. J. Konwar, learned counsel for the applicant, who submits that
Page No.# 2/2 there is a delay of 62 days in filing the appeal against the conviction of the applicant under Sections 376AB/302 IPC read with Section 6 of the POCSO Act vide the impugned Judgment dated 30.04.2026 passed by the learned Special Judge (POCSO), Udalguri in Special (P) Case No.17/2021. Mr. R.R. Kaushik, learned Addl. P.P submits that he has got no objection to the delay being condoned. Accordingly, the delay of 62 days is condoned. Registry to register the connected appeal and list the same. The I.A. is accordingly disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant