SHAIK AHAMADUNNISA BEGUM v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
CC/91/2026 · 2026-01-18
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14546 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14546 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010011022026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 91/2026 Between:
1. SHAIK AHAMADUNNISA BEGUM, OCC. ADVOCATE, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RIO. D.NO. 26-10-78, 4TH LANE, NAGARAMPADU, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, N. LAKSHMI NARAYANA, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDINGS, AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. 2. Y VENKATA PRASAD, THE STATION SHO, OLD GUNTUR POLICE STATION, 3. 3. SHAIK FAJULLA, S/O. SHAIK MASTHAN VALI, AGED ABOUT MAJOR, RIO. ANANDPET, OLD GUNTUR, GUNTUR URBAN DISTRICT, CELL 9848174535
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to direct the Respondent Police, to Complete the Inquiry in proper way and punish herein Respondents 2, 3, for their willful and intentional disobedience in accordance of the order dated 12-02-2025 in Criminal Petition No.10541 of 2022 on the file of this Honble High Court and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SIVA KUMARI SURINENI Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
2
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, by the Petitioner, against the respondents for violation of the Order passed by this Court in Criminal Petition No.10541 of 2022 dated 12.02.2025. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for Respondents. Perused the material on record. A perusal of the material on record would show that there is no element of violation of the Orders passed by this Court on 12.02.2025 in Crl.P.No.10541 of 2022 amounting to Contempt of Court by the respondents. Considering the submissions made and considering the request of the Petitioner, respondent Police are directed to conclude the investigation with regard to the subject crime and file a final report/charge sheet before the concerned Trial Court as expeditiously as possible preferably within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 19.01.2026
3
HON’BLE DR.
JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Contempt Case No. 91 of 2026
19.01.2026
Mjl /*