Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14545 (RAJ)

SAJID @ SAJID ALI SON OF AASU v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/11967/2026 · 2026-09-03

Ravi Chirania

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:35720] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11967/2026 CNR: RJHC020725922026 | URN: CRLMB / 22034U / 2026 Sajid @ Sajid Ali Son Of Aasu, Aged About 37 Years, Resident Of Ghaghwadi, Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg (At Present Accused-petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, Add. G.A. with Mr. Navdeep Singh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Order 03/09/2026 1. This misc. bail application has been filed by the petitioner Sajid @ Sajid Ali S/o Aasu, who was arrested by the police in connection with the FIR bearing No.574/2019 dated 16.10.2019 registered at Police Station Kaman, District Bharatpur for the offence punishable under Section 379 of IPC, 1860. 2. Learned counsel submits that the bail application filed by the petitioner was rejected by the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Kaman, Dist. Deeg, (Raj.) vide order dated 14.07.2026, thereafter, the petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S, 2023. 3. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submitted that police after conducting the investigation, filed the charge-sheet on 15.07.2026. Learned counsel submitted that the tractor involved [2026:RJ-JP:35720] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11967/2026] in this case has already been recovered by the police and handed over to the complainant. Therefore, nothing survives adverse against him after filing of the charge-sheet. In view thereof, learned counsel prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposes the bail application, however, admitted that the tractor, involved in this case has been given to the complainant and charge-sheet has been filed and nothing survives which may obstruct his enlargement on bail. 5. After considering the overall facts and circumstances, the nature of the allegations as mentioned in the FIR, no recovery is required to be made from the petitioner and noting that the petitioner is behind the bars since long and trial will take considerable long time to conclude. Without commenting upon merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to exercise its power under Section 483 B.N.S.S. and deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Sajid @ Sajid Ali S/o Aasu shall be released on bail, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. 7. The petitioner is further directed not to take undue advantage of liberty or misuse the liberty granted by this Court. It [2026:RJ-JP:35720] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11967/2026] is made clear that the observation as made by this Court in the bail application will not affect the trial of the case. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J 126/RINCHU